The Forbidden Combinations of Amino acids & Genetic Codes (codons)
The proteogenic amino acids tryptophan, cysteine, and methionine have only a single codon for each in the table of universal genetic code. The relative frequency of each of these codons is 1.5625%. Strikingly, the relative distribution of these amino acids in enzymes is also invariably less than 3.0% irrespective of the class and type of the reaction catalyzed. The amino acids other than tryptophan, cysteine and methionine show variable distributions. One would also find that the following genetic code combinations are very rare in nature. There are some hypothetical, predicted, or cloned sequences and proteins in the databases like NCBI. But, none of them are natural.The list of forbidden genetic code combinations:
1. TGGTGTATG corresponding to the amino acid combination WCM
2. TGGATGTGT corresponding to the amino acid combination WMC
3. TGTATGTGG corresponding to the amino acid combination CMW
4. TGTTGGATG corresponding to the amino acid combination CWM
5. ATGTGTTGG corresponding to the amino acid combination MCW
6. ATGTGGTGT corresponding to the amino acid combination MCW
Based on these observations, I conclude that nature does not allow all the genetic code combinations to occur with equal probability. If the combinations occur equally likely, then one should observe these combinations with the same relative frequency as those of other code combinations. Why nature forbids such combinations is yet to be answered. Is it biophysically restricted or is it a genetic restriction? These are unanswered questions.
One could also make proteins, if possible, with these restricted combinations (either by site directed
mutagenesis or by solid state synthesis) and study their biophysical properties. The above observation is purely based on the data available from the NCBI and RCSB.
To verify this claim:
1. Run blastp at http://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi for wcmwmccmwcwmmcwmwc and check the output, check for the proteins, find whether they are hypothetical or biochemically characterized.
2. Run blastn at http://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi for TGGTGTATGAAAAAAAAAAA,
TGGATGTGTAAAAAAAAAAA, TGTATGTGGAAAAAAAAAAA, TGTTGGATGAAAAAAAAAAA,
ATGTGTTGGAAAAAAAAAAA, ATGTGGTGTAAAAAAAAAAA, and check each output. One would find similar sequences only, no exact match (except some clones).
Sivashanmugam. P., Lecturer, Biophysical Chemistry,
Department of Bioinformatics, Jamal Mohamed College, Tiruchirappalli – 620020 – India
e-mail: soundaryanayaki@aol.com
The proteogenic amino acids tryptophan, cysteine, and methionine have only a single codon for each in the table of universal genetic code. The relative frequency of each of these codons is 1.5625%. Strikingly, the relative distribution of these amino acids in enzymes is also invariably less than 3.0% irrespective of the class and type of the reaction catalyzed. The amino acids other than tryptophan, cysteine and methionine show variable distributions. One would also find that the following genetic code combinations are very rare in nature. There are some hypothetical, predicted, or cloned sequences and proteins in the databases like NCBI. But, none of them are natural.The list of forbidden genetic code combinations:
1. TGGTGTATG corresponding to the amino acid combination WCM
2. TGGATGTGT corresponding to the amino acid combination WMC
3. TGTATGTGG corresponding to the amino acid combination CMW
4. TGTTGGATG corresponding to the amino acid combination CWM
5. ATGTGTTGG corresponding to the amino acid combination MCW
6. ATGTGGTGT corresponding to the amino acid combination MCW
Based on these observations, I conclude that nature does not allow all the genetic code combinations to occur with equal probability. If the combinations occur equally likely, then one should observe these combinations with the same relative frequency as those of other code combinations. Why nature forbids such combinations is yet to be answered. Is it biophysically restricted or is it a genetic restriction? These are unanswered questions.
One could also make proteins, if possible, with these restricted combinations (either by site directed
mutagenesis or by solid state synthesis) and study their biophysical properties. The above observation is purely based on the data available from the NCBI and RCSB.
To verify this claim:
1. Run blastp at http://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi for wcmwmccmwcwmmcwmwc and check the output, check for the proteins, find whether they are hypothetical or biochemically characterized.
2. Run blastn at http://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi for TGGTGTATGAAAAAAAAAAA,
TGGATGTGTAAAAAAAAAAA, TGTATGTGGAAAAAAAAAAA, TGTTGGATGAAAAAAAAAAA,
ATGTGTTGGAAAAAAAAAAA, ATGTGGTGTAAAAAAAAAAA, and check each output. One would find similar sequences only, no exact match (except some clones).
Sivashanmugam. P., Lecturer, Biophysical Chemistry,
Department of Bioinformatics, Jamal Mohamed College, Tiruchirappalli – 620020 – India
e-mail: soundaryanayaki@aol.com
No comments:
Post a Comment